文章写作中的逻辑技巧

文章写作中的逻辑技巧（精选6篇）

篇1：文章写作中的逻辑技巧

文章写作中的逻辑技巧

逻辑指的是思维的规律和规则，是对思维过程的抽象。文章写作，在公务员考试申论科目中占据重要位置，但是鲜有人能够真正去认知理解并去真正操刀写作。

写作前提我们要知道，这是什么文体。

是议论文，那就意味我们的整篇文章一定是在讲清楚某个道理，试图让人去信服你，既然要讲清楚道理，肯定要围绕着某个中心来展开，也就是我们的中心论点，也就是说，通过中心论点做出了一个判断，后续的文字则是围绕这个判断来把道理讲清楚即可。

比如中心句是“所有人都包藏私心”，接下来就用一系列道理来说清楚生存的本质是获取，或者社会本质是为了更好的满足，或者用其它来证明人人都包藏私心。

既然是判断句，则必须有判断的对象，如文化、经济、工匠精神、动物保护、心理健康等等，我们定义为：主题。

必须有判断对象具备的特质，我们定义为：角度申论答题技巧：文章写作必须知道的逻辑思维申论答题技巧：文章写作必须知道的逻辑思维。

所以完整的判断句是：某个对象离不开(具备)(需要)(拥有)(成为)某种特质;既判断句为：主题+角度。

所以中心论点一般为主题+角度构成判断。

如：好政策能够滋养公民的.理性与德性、通过文化输出成为大国、幸福始终充满着缺陷。

中心论点确定之后，必然要围绕中心论点讲道理，既然需要讲清楚幸福始终充满着缺陷，就得利用道理或者事实来说明，所有幸福都不能缺少一个要素就是“缺陷”。

才能真正证明所提出的观点

那我们将幸福表示为：A。

缺陷表示为：B。

则：A⇒ B。

所以要论证，必须从A上寻找论据，通过论证，从而证明B。

如果从A上论据的论证可以分成若干类型，则每一个类型可以命名为一个分论点

淘宝精品

如图：

申论答题技巧：文章写作必须知道的逻辑思维

如果要证明A推出B，若A有A1、A2、A3、A4四个部分，则这四个部分可以作为分论点申论答题技巧：文章写作必须知道的逻辑思维公务员考试。

即：

如果：

A1—B

A2—B

A3—B

A4—B

那么：

A—B

例：

比如宜居城市的建设需要注重生活质量，主题：宜居城市。

角度：注重生活质量(这样的选题必须深刻理解申论材料，从中找出主题、角度)。

我们可以三步走写出作文。

1、确定框架：

总论点：宜居城市—生活质量

分论点：

资源环境协调—生活质量

服务设施完善—生活质量

产业发展引领—生活质量

2、加工要点：

总论点：宜居城市要向生活质量型转变

分论点：

宜居城市体现在资源环境的协调

宜居城市体现在服务设施的完善

宜居城市体现在产业发展的引领

最后根据上面的框架写出文章。

篇2：文章写作中的逻辑技巧

二是少出初中级别的语法错误，三是用几个漂亮的collocation，四是尽量用复杂句。

前两个最重要!

关于逻辑性，这一点恐怕是中国学生备考中最缺乏的，因为市面上的一些应试教材，包括各种辅导班的老师都很少提及。

逻辑性主要有两点:一是全篇文章要有逻辑，比如先说自己反对一方的观点，然后再反驳之，这点大家应该都能做到。

关键是第二点，每一段的各个支撑理由之间，和每个支撑理由内部也要有逻辑性。

观点或理由之间应该是logical的链接而不只是用linking词来link。

所以，形式上，我的作文也许用first of all，但绝不会再用secondly，thirdly 这样的linker。

另外，少用模板，或者少用中国模板。

我曾故意在一篇文章中用了类似这样的“Just like a coin has two sides，this question also has its drawbacks。

篇3：优选写作技巧,构建优质文章

从学生的议论文写作训练中总能发现一些通病, 比如事例不真实, 不准确, 缺乏典型性, 论据罗列、堆砌, 论证意识不强, 分析说理简单化, 论证结构不完整, 等等。针对这些现象, 我认为高中阶段的议论文教学不能只停留在指导学生提炼论点、提供给他们更多的论据上, 而应该教会他们如何正确使用论据、如何合理选用论证方法。但是在写作教学过程中, 我觉得奉行“送去主义”不如实行“拿来主义”。教师直接告诉学生该怎么做, 往往不能引起学生的重视, 只有让学生自己来拿, 自己学, 自己领悟, 学生才会真正得其要领, 明其方法。因此, 在议论文的写作教学上我采用“印发病文———分析病因———修改升格”和“佳文品析———迁移演练”的方法。下面我就作文的开头、论据的使用、论证的方法和文章的结构等方面加以阐述。

一、未成曲调先有情, 一曲终了情未了

“花香蜂自来, 题好文一半。”文章的开头要有如凤头般漂亮, 中间部分要像猪肚一样充实, 结尾则如豹尾般深刻有力, 如是方为好文章。这里就作文的开头谈谈如何让学生更好地掌握其中的写作技巧。我主要采用“佳文品析———迁移演练”的方法, 并与仿写考点相结合。它的优点是把从仿写考点中学得的表达技巧迁移运用到作文开头的写作中来, 既能巩固仿写这一考点, 又能深刻到位地把握文章开头的写法, 双管齐下, 颇有收效。

在教授仿写知识点时, 我告诉学生掌握好仿写的方法和提高仿写的能力对作文开头的写作非常有帮助。作文开头采用仿写的方式可以收到意想不到的佳效。这样既激发了学生用心学习仿写的积极性, 又增强了他们对作文开头写作的期待, 为作文开头的教学打下了良好的基础。仿写学习完后就马上进入作文开头的写作训练。开头的写作方法不止一种, 不管是哪种开头法, 我的教学流程如下: (1) 一段优秀作文的开头片断, 让学生鉴赏; (2) 提问思考, 属哪种开头法, 有什么特点; (3) 教师点评、分析归纳; (4) 课堂或课后迁移演练, 加以巩固; (5) 教师对学生习作进行进一步的点评。下面以“诗句串珠法”为例:

1. 佳文品析

漫步于秋日落叶徐徐的小径上, 不禁吟了一句:“无边落叶萧萧下, 不尽愁绪滚滚来。”落叶的生命或许就是这样, 只求得春日繁茂, 秋日落英缤纷。慨叹落叶的悲哀与不幸之余, 不妨换个思维方式, 龚自珍不也说过“落红不是无情物, 化作春泥更护花”吗?是的, 我们更该欣喜, 享受落英缤纷的秋景。

———《寻找快乐, 精彩人生》

这个开头由情景入手, 化用杜甫的“无边落木萧萧下, 不尽长江滚滚来”, 自然引出对落叶的联想。然后再引用龚自珍的名句, 恰当地诠释了“快乐幸福与我们的思维方式”这一哲理话题的内涵。这样处理, 使文章在开头便显得意蕴深厚、诗意灵动, 从而避免了“开门见山”式说理的干巴枯燥。

2. 仿写

(1) 责任是诸葛亮的“鞠躬尽瘁, 死而后已”的忠诚, 责任是, 责任是。责任如山, 我们也要将它扛在肩上。

———《扛起责任》

(2) 我国诗人有诗云:“感时花溅泪, 恨别鸟惊心。”其实, 这句诗正说明了景随情迁的道理, 对事物的认识和一个人的感情有很大关系。王维的“明月松间照, 清泉石上流”, 我们读到了淡; (1) ; (2) 。可见, 不同的人生际遇和心境使得他们对事物的认识也大为迥异。

———《感时花溅泪》

3. 迁移演练

所谓“古来圣贤皆寂寞”, 请以《守住内心的寂寞》为题写一篇作文。

要求:用“诗句串珠”法写一个开头。

像这种借用仿写的方式来开头的方法一教下去, 很快就收到学生反馈过来的好消息, 每逢写作时咬烂笔头高喊“万事开头难”的声音越来越小。写作有了一个好的开始, 下面就更有信心, 也写得更顺手了。

二、概述材料点石成金, 紧扣论点水乳交融

论据是议论文的必备要素之一。议论文无论是阐明正确观点还是反驳错误观点, 都要以事实作为说理的依据。怎样运用“事实论据”, 会直接影响到议论文的论证效果;能从“选择———概述———分析议论———合理排序”各个环节恰到好处地运用“事实论据”, 议论文就更能言之有理, 具有更强的说服力。虽然已是高中生, 但不少学生在论据的运用上仍存在不少问题, 特别是对论据的叙述和分析。在论据的写作教学上, 我采用“印发病文———分析病因———修改升格”的教学方法。先从学生的习作中找来一篇病文印发给学生, 如有一篇名为《克制》的议论文, 其中的事实论据叙述具体, 写得有声有色, 变成了一个生动的故事, 这是记叙文的写法。这样, 不但文字冗长, 而且喧宾夺主, 转移了读者对论据本质的思考, 分散了注意力, 削弱了论证的作用。其次, 要求学生自己把病文的问题找出来, 即作病状分析, 提出修改意见。最后要求学生动手对其进行修改, 对文章进行升格。通过这样的教学, 让学生明确再精当的论据如果叙述不当, 是收不到良好的论证效果的。

当然, 叙述论据时仅是概述也不够, 要紧扣论点, 而不能面面俱到。要凸显出论据与论点相吻合的那部分内容, 与论点关系不大或无关的内容要略写或大胆舍弃。例如:1852年2月21日, 俄国伟大的作家果戈理逝世了, 他的挚友屠格涅夫, 用沉重的笔和着自己的悲伤, 赶写出一篇悼念果戈理的文章。但是, 沙皇统治者害怕这个俄罗斯人民爱戴的名字出现在报刊上。他们禁止发表一切悼念和颂扬果戈理的文章。正直而勇敢的屠格涅夫不怕专制主义者的威胁, 他机智地避开沙皇侦探的监视, 离开彼得堡, 把文章送到莫斯科, 趁那里还没有接到禁令, 把文章在《莫斯科新闻》上刊登了出来。沙皇的特务机关不久就见到了这篇文章, 他们传讯了屠格涅夫。沙皇早就痛恨这个经常在《现代人》杂志上登载《猎人笔记》的作家。在把屠格涅夫监禁一个月后, 沙皇亲自下令, 把屠格涅夫流放到斯马达斯基去。为了果戈理, 为了朋友而被流放的屠格涅夫, 感到自豪和光荣。这个事实材料可以证明的论点有多个, 如: (1) 友谊高于一切; (2) 勇敢的人敢于战胜困难; (3) 正义终将战胜邪恶; (4) 敢于向权势挑战。如要证明“友谊高于一切”的论点, 在叙述时就要凸显出“屠格涅夫写了悼念挚友果戈理的文章, 刊登在《莫斯科新闻》上被监禁一个月后, 又被流放到斯马达斯基。为了果戈理, 为了朋友而被流放的屠格涅夫, 感到自豪和光荣”的内容;如要证明“敢于向权势挑战”的论点, 在叙述时就要凸显出“沙皇统治者禁止发表任何有关果戈理的文章。正直而勇敢的屠格涅夫不怕专制主义者的威胁, 他机智地避开沙皇侦探的监视, 离开彼得堡, 把文章送到莫斯科, 趁那里还没有接到禁令, 把文章在《莫斯科新闻》上刊登了出来”的内容。

再者, 把分析与修改的主动权交给学生, 这种方法对提高学生的判断、分析和思辨能力很有帮助, 也培养了学生自主修改文章的能力。

当然, 只解决论据如何叙述的问题还远远不够, 论据只是作为说明观点的材料, 如果论据与论点结合不紧密, 效果就会大打折扣。那么该怎么做才能使论据与论点紧密结合成为一个有机体呢?这也是一个亟待解决的问题。我仍采用“印发病文———分析病因———修改升格”的教学方法, 让学生明白论据只是一种手段, 不能代替说理, 说理才是真正的目的, 只列举一些论据而不作必要的解释、评述和引申发挥, 就是以事代理、以引代理, 论据只能游离于论点外, 而不能起到论证论点的作用。所以, 使用论据之后的分析论述是必不可少的。

那么怎样对论据进行有力的分析论述呢?我采用的是“佳文鉴析———迁移演练”的方法, 操作如下: (1) 印发优秀范文给学生赏析, 并重点标示出紧扣论点分析论述的内容; (2) 让学生讨论分析论述是如何进行的, 有哪些好的论述方法; (3) 教师进行点拨、归纳; (4) 印发相关训练材料让学生当堂完成; (5) 教师在学生演练完成后做出及时的点评, 帮助巩固。

三、增强论证力度, 优化文章结构

针对不同的论点、不同的事实材料, 可以选择不同的论证方法和论证结构。相同的论点和论据采用不同的论证方法和论证结构, 效果也大不相同。而学生往往容易忽略这一点, 不管三七二十一地乱用一通, 于是就会出现如下的问题: (1) 论证方法不当, 结构不合理; (2) “本论”部分有的层次不清, 有的并列不当, 有的逻辑混乱等; (3) 段落层次缺少过渡, 结构不完整。因此, 在高中阶段加强学生的议论文结构意识尤其必要。在这一方面, 我采用了“印发病文———分析病因———修改升格”和“佳文鉴析———迁移演练”相结合的方法, 让学生了解和掌握议论文的结构和层次。我借助病文和佳文, 通过“旧瓶装新酒”的办法来完成首次的迁移演练, 以便巩固。比如指导学生对层进式的佳文只保留层进式结构框架, 重拟论点, 重选论据完成写作, 从中体会该结构模式, 把它内化为自己的东西。

篇4：写作中的逻辑应用

那么，我们在写作中应该注意哪些逻辑知识的应用呢？可以从以下三个方面着手。

一、概念准确，命题恰当

在写作中常常会出现偷换概念或混淆概念、偷换论题或混淆论题（或转移论题）致使偏题跑题的低级错误。其根本原因就是对概念和命题把握不准。如高考作文题目“纪念”，很多同学把“纪念”与“怀念”直接等同，也有同学分不清怀念、思念、记忆等语词与纪念的区别，写成“学会怀念”“永久的回忆”“对过去的回忆”“追忆往事”等，造成偏离话题而扣分。所以，准确地把握概念的内涵和外延，就能恰当地表达命题，就能使作文的逻辑性增强，就能使作文的主题或论题鲜明突出。

有不少作文考题就是在概念或命题的揭示中考查我们写作能力的。如2005年重庆市高考作文题目：“自嘲”在《现代汉语词典》中的解释是自我的嘲笑，它是一种幽默的生活态度，也是一种调节心理的方式，还是一种智慧的表现。请以“自嘲”为题目写一篇文章。这个题目中的“自嘲”是一个概念，命题者在题目中对这个概念作了解释，也就是说，这个词既可看作贬义，是一种自我的嘲笑；也可以看作一个褒义，是一种幽默的生活态度，是一种调节心理的方式；还是一种智慧的表现。这样，供考生选择的空间就大了。如此就把握了“自嘲”的内涵和外延，写作起来也就不会天马行空了。

二、推理合理，思维严密

写作中，运用推理来行文的很多，这就要求我们必须做到推理合理，思维严密。推理就是从一个或几个已知命题（判断）推出一个新命题（判断）的思维形式。在众多的推理形式中，最常见的是三段论、二难推理和论证推理等几种形式。无论选择哪种形式，都要使推理过程合理，思维严密。这样，文章就会破立得当，论证有力，无懈可击。请看下面的学生习作节选：

小孩子的愤怒骂声，换回了小山毫不客气的回敬——这是回声。母亲对孩子说：“如果你和和气气地对它说，它就会和和气气地对待你。”

是的，世上许多事情都是这样的，像回声这样，你怎样的付出 ，就能得到怎样的回报。

对于朋友，你付出了真诚、宽容与信任，那么，你会得到一份美好的友谊，得到了友谊，更得到了另一颗真诚的心；同样，你可以有另一种付出，挖苦、嘲笑，对于朋友召之即来，挥之即去。那么，回报你的将是朋友的远去，留给你的将是他人的无法信任……

作者从“回声”中得到的启示是“怎样的付出就得到怎样的回报”，进而类比开去推理，去谈如何对待朋友，在“回报”这一联接项上得以共振，推理合理，思维严密而有广度，使文章联接严密，不可辩驳，收到很好的效果。

三、把握规律，综合运用

写作文讲究思路清晰，而思路清晰取决于思维过程的正确，也就是说，思维过程要遵循一些基本的规则，即逻辑规律。普通逻辑基本规律包括同一律、矛盾律和排中律（可参看人教版高中必修4P86的《逻辑和语文学习》有关介绍）。这些逻辑规律对人的思维有强制性，违背了它，思维就会发生混乱，就不能正确地认识事物，更不能准确地表达思想。写作中综合运用这些逻辑规律，不仅能避免出现混淆概念、自相矛盾等问题，还能使文章思路清晰，论证严密，处处闪耀出理性的光辉。请看下面的考场佳作节选：

东风乍起，温柔地轻抚我。

我是一粒尘埃，随风而起，随风而落，有时随波逐流。我不是树，我没有根，我没有迷人的芬芳，我没有美妙的外表，我是那么的卑微与渺小。但是，巍峨的高山里有我，磅礴的江河里有我，圣洁的雪花里有我，我是这蔚蓝色星球的机体，我是这苍茫宇宙的历史和未来。

当你用心把我放大十倍百倍，我就不再卑微。透过我，你可曾看到美丽的希腊文化在亚历山大大帝的铁蹄下盛开？你可曾目睹中世纪的欧洲被天主教的阴霾笼罩？你可曾见识拿破仑的版图从中欧到西欧……

请你相信，捧我在手中，放我在心上，你将惊叹，世界比你想象中更加不可思议。

……

相信我，你面前的我，是尘埃，也是宇宙。

（《是尘埃，也是宇宙》）

“尘埃”“宇宙”是一对“小”与“大”的矛盾体，同时又是一个包容体，而作者却以此作为作文标题，显得不凡。更重要的是，作者能将最小概念的一粒尘埃放大，融进历史，传达出作者对历史人事的感悟，让人领略时代的星空和生命哲理，揭示出尘埃之中见宇宙的大道理，体现出思维的缜密，散发出逻辑规律运用的芳香。

篇5：托福写作提升文章逻辑性重在展开

托福官方指南对写作展开的要求一览

首先我们来看一下OG是如何要求well-developed的：

.ave I done my best to support and develop my ideas?

(有没有支持立场的分论点?)

.o I include enough details in each paragraph so that the main idea and topic sentence are explained fully?

(每段是否有很充分的细节支持分论点?)

.o I use words and phrases that help the reader think about relationships between different ideas in the essay?

(句与句之间是否有用逻辑连接词/短语?)

注意句子逻辑性是展开关键

每个段落要做到很好的展开，就要注意句与句之间的逻辑性。官方指南OGP中介绍了很多种展开的方法，包括讲故事、举例子、说道理等等，同时补充了大量的逻辑连接词。同学们习惯于把逻辑连接词/短语事先准备好，平时练习或者考试时都先打出来再往里面僵硬地填充内容，以为可以骗过e-rater和考官。但在这些逻辑词下，我们往往会看到同学写出这样的内容：因为独生子女，所以自私;因为科技和经济发展，所以压力大。

其实第二句和第一句之间并没有直接的因果关系，第二句并不是对第一句的进一步论述，所以即便有暗示逻辑关系的连接词/短语，内容上并非如此。也就是不符合评分标准中的渐进性(progression)。

在“因为独生子女，所以自私”的例子中，我们可以这样推理：独生子女(only-child)→得到更多家人的关注(limelight)→缺少付出的意识(less give, more take)→自私(egoism);此外，独生子女→缺少和兄弟姐妹的相处(interact with siblings)→缺少分享的意识(share)→自私。

这样的两条简单逻辑链就可以推出“自私”的结果。

如何提升托福写作展开铺设逻辑链的能力?

对于提升托福写作中展开逻辑链，小编建议大家结合托福写作机经中的主题句，在草稿纸上用中文关键词罗列因果链，训练演绎推理的方法，反复追问因果关系(causality)是否成立。通过这种方式来训练自己的逻辑思维能力，进而逐步学会展开的写作思路和方法。

托福考试作文独立写作范文：经济危机时政府减少支出

In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce its spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens.

托福写作范文参考:

During an economic crisis, governments face difficult choices of monetary allocation with reduced budgets. In this challenging time, it is of vital importance for policy-makers to recognize the effectiveness of policy-making on certain social services or programs such as arts, scientific research and park and public gardens. If a choice has to be made, in my opinion, the government should reduce its spending on arts.

To begin with, in times of an economic crisis, it is significant for policy-makers to recognize the necessity of investing in scientific research because it exerts a far-reaching effect. If the financial crisis leads to substantial cuts in funding for scientific research by governments, it will be difficult to muster investment for a public good, like clean air, or for extremely risky initiatives, such as novel approaches to new antibiotic drugs, or in areas where the outcome is uncertain. As a matter of fact, technological innovation, biomedical breakthroughs, and tackling pressing environmental issues all require sustained scientific development, from basic discovery to final application. Investing in research is investing in the future, and it requires a long-term commitment to the accumulation of knowledge, the testing of basic principles, and the translation of these discoveries into practical applications that impact everyday life. Consequently, governments ought to attach more importance to the scientific studies so as to develop world class research base and conduct crucial scientific projects.

Furthermore, funding for parks and public gardens provides an opportunity for people to engage in physical activities, which is considerably beneficial to health. Nowadays, due to the sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy eating diet, overweight and obesity are epidemic problems across the world, and related conditions are on the rise. A primary focus of attention is providing environment where people can be physically active. Parks offer such an opportunity. In addition, health studies have shown that people who do regular exercise get a range of benefits when they are in natural settings, like parks and public gardens. These benefits include reduced risk of premature death; reduced risk of heart disease, hypertension, cancer; improved maintenance of muscle strength; weight loss and favorable redistribution of body fat; improved physical functioning. Therefore, when governments allocate fiscal spending on parks such as well-designed and well-maintained paths as well as attractive scenery, people can substantially improve their health and quality of life by doing moderate amounts of physical activity in their daily lives.

Undeniably, if governments pay more attention to investment in art, people can enrich inner world as a diverse and productive cultural environment can provide the spirit and important intangible values. However, in times of crisis, people usually lay emphasis on basic needs instead of spiritual needs. As a result, the importance of material comforts outweighs that of nourishment for the mind and it does not mean that people’s quality of life will be dramatically affected if governments cut budget on art and provide less financial support on art institutions. In a sense, it will not directly influence people’s life at least in a short term because people rarely need to satisfy their aesthetic needs everyday. Therefore, compared with scientific research and park and public gardens, art is least associated with people’s daily life and it needs less concern.

From what has been discussed above, scientific studies serve the common interest of the entire human race and doing exercise in parks and public gardens constitutes an indispensable part of daily life. It is more applicable and reasonable to cut down spending on art in the times of an economic crisis.

托福考试作文独立写作范文：学习有限的课程对身心发展有用吗

In a word, studying only limited courses will be supportive for students’ physical and mental growth as well as their future careers.

2月27日: High school students are required to study many different subjects at same time or they should study only three or four subject at a time, which do you agree?

范文参考一:

As for me, studying only three or four subjects appears to be a better choice and the listed reasons and examples will support what I believe.

To begin with, current young students have been under enormous pressure, doing great harm to their growth, and there is no need to impose too much pressure on them. To be more specific, to strengthen students’ future competitiveness in the society, most schools have expected to forge students’ various capacities since they were young by arranging a huge number of curriculums. What an ordinary high school student has to experience in his one-day school life can demonstrate how depressed and exhausted present high school students are. Getting up as early as 6AM has become common in recent two decades. Afterwards, a whole-day study will include various compulsory and optional courses like Mathematics that leads to intellectual stimulation or History that demands students to attempt to memorize historic events and relative effects as many as possible. When class is over, it is still far away from ending one-day study since lots of assignments such as the short essays or scientific researches need to be finished. Evidently, students suffer from the huge pressure from study, leading many of them to wear glasses at a young age and to be drained physically and mentally everyday. Thus, students are not supposed to be ordered to study many courses at a time.

To be followed, the inadequacy of enough leisure time will contribute students to have no chances to engage in what they interested in. High school students are still involved in an age during which they should exploit their own interests to decide which area they will choose when going to college in their near future. However, like I mentioned in the previous statement, to meet the requirements set by school; students have no option but to immerse themselves in a number of assignments and the freedom to pursue their own hobbies has been deprived. It is known to all that interest plays a leading role in assisting people to choose their future career and a recent released statistic in a survey conducted by Beijing Human Resource General Bureau indicates that approximately 67 percent of college undergraduates switch their professions from their major-related areas to what they are truly interested in their third year after graduation. In addition, many of the respondents claim that they are not satisfied with the current educational system, requiring students to study a wide range of curriculums, because it entirely downplays the importance of cultivating students’ hobbies and they believe that the earlier students can discover their interest, the more setbacks they can avoid when choosing future majors in the university and upcoming professors after graduation. A friend I know named Andy refused to become a mechanical engineer since he was bored to stay in the office building and finally chose to become a teacher in a educational institute since he can apply his passion and extrovert personality into the profession. Accordingly, student should be given more opportunities to develop their own hobbies to explore what they love.

写作参考二:

Do you agree or disagree high-school students are required to study many different subjects at same time or they should study only three or four subjects at a time.

Teenagers are in the prime time of their life. What they learn in this period is a huge factor in determining their whole life. To make better use of this valuable time, some educators advocate that students are supposed to study as many subjects as possible at a time. However, I don’t think it is a smart move. Instead, studying three or four subjects at a time would serve them better.

To begin with, only three or four subjects at a time ensure that students have enough time and energy to make further research in each of these fields. It allows them to bite deeply into these subjects, thus gaining the whole picture of a certain field in their mind rather than just a smattering of knowledge. It is not hard to imagine what they would suffer when they have too many things in their plate. They would find themselves wrestling with complex chemical formulas, intertwined history events and distinctions between invertebrates and amphibians on the same very day. In consequence, they would end up with spreading themselves too thin and cannot gain a deeper understanding in any of the fields.

Besides, when students are allowed to choose three or four subjects at a time based on their own interest, they would performer better without under a huge amount of mental pressure. As an old saying goes, interest is the best teacher. When what they learn really appeal to them, they are more keen on their school work. On the contrary, if they are forced to learn too many subjects at a time, chances are that they not only cannot be guaranteed with good grade but also get upset and frustrated. Things may get even worse when they find some of these subjects are extremely bothersome and annoying. I have experienced the suffering. When I was in high school, history was the most difficult one for me. Those intertwined history events, exact dates of those events, and various complex names of important figures involved in them just drove me crazy. When the finals were just around the corner, I always burnt mid-night oil to hit history books, feeling so tense and stressed up. So only when students spend their time on just three or four subjects that truly attractive to them can they get good grade on each subject and enjoy their high-school time happily.

What cannot be denied is that there are such versatile brainiacs who can handle with so many subjects at the same time without any difficulty. However, only a small fraction of students are in this line. For most of the students in high school, three or four subjects at a time are more acceptable and effective for their study.

To sum up, I am on the board with the idea that students will benefit more from taking just three or four subjects at a time.

篇6：雅思写作词汇语法和逻辑技巧

Where should this visitor go on that day? Why?

Model Answer:

Traveling is a good way to find out more about different countries with different traditions and customs. Some travelers prefer to spend in one country just a few days or one day and then leave for another country. This way of traveling allows people to visit more countries in fewer days. Unfortunately, in this case such travelers have to hurry in order to visit more places.

I am from Saint-Petersburg, Russia. So, if a foreign visitor has only one day to spend in my country I think I would advice him to visit the “Hermitage” - the most well known and amazing museum in Russia. The “Hermitage” has 3 floors and more then 100 halls. It is really amazing to visit that place. Many people from all over the world every day enter its walls. Some of the rooms devoted to the history of other countries. Others devoted to the art of a famous painter and the history of his life. However, most of the halls conclude many things such as paintings, royal belongings, sculptures from Russian history.

Some people say that it is impossible to feel deeply and see all these amazing historical values for one visit. I have to completely agree with this statement. When I first visited the “Hermitage” I was 14 years old. It impressed me so much that I was back next day to see what I had not been able to see the day before.